Comments on: Decent Unified IM Clients http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients Alex King's blog - software, photography, sports, etc. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:06:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Alex http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-3892 Alex Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:58:06 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-3892 <a href="http://alexking.org/blog/2004/08/05/adium/">Me too.</a> Me too.

]]> By: B.Y. Low http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-3891 B.Y. Low Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:38:26 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-3891 i am usng Adium on my os10.3.7 So far, I have no problem with it. You can check it out on www.adiumx.com i am usng Adium on my os10.3.7 So far, I have no problem with it. You can check it out on www.adiumx.com

]]> By: Lars Næsbye Christensen http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-883 Lars Næsbye Christensen Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:44:03 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-883 Proteus is my best bet for a Mac multi-client now, though it does not support file transfer yet. A newcomer on the scene is Adium (www.adiumx.com) , which is still in alpha, but from the alpha versions it looks like it's really going to kick a** Proteus is my best bet for a Mac multi-client now, though it does not support file transfer yet.

A newcomer on the scene is Adium (www.adiumx.com) , which is still in alpha, but from the alpha versions it looks like it’s really going to kick a**

]]> By: Alex http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-217 Alex Sun, 08 Jun 2003 15:43:40 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-217 I think I tried Proteus a year or more ago, I should give it another shot. Especially since Fire doesn't seem to like to connect to some of the protocols through a firewall. I think I tried Proteus a year or more ago, I should give it another shot. Especially since Fire doesn’t seem to like to connect to some of the protocols through a firewall.

]]> By: Chris Utley http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-216 Chris Utley Sun, 08 Jun 2003 12:20:51 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-216 Have you tried Proteus? I like the UI better than Fire, but both tend to be slightly buggy. Development on Proteus seems to have slowed down big time. Also, I've heard rumors that iChat 2.0 will support multiple services (crossing fingers and toes - doing rain dance - tossing salt over both shoulders). Have you tried Proteus? I like the UI better than Fire, but both tend to be slightly buggy. Development on Proteus seems to have slowed down big time.

Also, I’ve heard rumors that iChat 2.0 will support multiple services (crossing fingers and toes - doing rain dance - tossing salt over both shoulders).

]]> By: bitweever http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-211 bitweever Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:34:13 +0000 http://alexking.org/blog/2003/06/05/decent-unified-im-clients#comment-211 Thanks for the 'Fire' link, I've been looking for a Trillian-like client for OS X! Thanks for the ‘Fire’ link, I’ve been looking for a Trillian-like client for OS X!

]]>