<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MsgFiler &#8211; Must Have for Mail.app Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler</link>
	<description>Alex King, Denver Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsgFiler Available in Mac AppStore &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-151226</link>
		<dc:creator>MsgFiler Available in Mac AppStore &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-151226</guid>
		<description>[...] a huge fan of MsgFiler and have been using it since 2006. I honestly can&#8217;t imagine using Mail without it. It allows you to quickly and easily file [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a huge fan of MsgFiler and have been using it since 2006. I honestly can&#8217;t imagine using Mail without it. It allows you to quickly and easily file [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Must-Have Software &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-61406</link>
		<dc:creator>Must-Have Software &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-61406</guid>
		<description>[...] Keyboard-only message filing in Mail.app. My review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keyboard-only message filing in Mail.app. My review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52917</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52917</guid>
		<description>The reason why Google got web search to work again was because it takes lots of input (links) for search terms. So if you search for a synonym, you find what you&#039;re looking for. Unfortunately, that doesn&#039;t work when searching through e-mail. You have to search on exactly the right term to find what you&#039;re looking for. I find my mail search tools woefully inadequate and find it is often faster to browse my filed messages.

Another benefit, on IMAP, is that many smaller folders are much faster than a few big ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why Google got web search to work again was because it takes lots of input (links) for search terms. So if you search for a synonym, you find what you&#8217;re looking for. Unfortunately, that doesn&#8217;t work when searching through e-mail. You have to search on exactly the right term to find what you&#8217;re looking for. I find my mail search tools woefully inadequate and find it is often faster to browse my filed messages.</p>
<p>Another benefit, on IMAP, is that many smaller folders are much faster than a few big ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52914</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52914</guid>
		<description>Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43folders.com/2006/11/17/manual-email-filing/&quot;&gt;I&#039;m with Merlin on this one: what benefits do you get from having 100+ folders?&lt;/a&gt;

Trust me, I used to be there myself, back in the days when I ran Eudora on a PC in college.

[That said, this question is best answered at the link above.]  Undoubtedly, what Adam&#039;s done here is excellent if that&#039;s how you&#039;re managing email.  Two thumbs up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2006/11/17/manual-email-filing/">I&#8217;m with Merlin on this one: what benefits do you get from having 100+ folders?</a></p>
<p>Trust me, I used to be there myself, back in the days when I ran Eudora on a PC in college.</p>
<p>[That said, this question is best answered at the link above.]  Undoubtedly, what Adam&#8217;s done here is excellent if that&#8217;s how you&#8217;re managing email.  Two thumbs up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52910</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Kerim and Geof, Mail Act-On is great for the occasional rule, but when you&#039;re talking about filing mail into 100+ folders, it just isn&#039;t the right tool; when I once tried it, I actually thought to myself, &quot;I&#039;m trying to use a screwdriver as a saw here!&quot;  MsgFiler has now changed my life -- I&#039;m actually jealous that Alex has had access to this for over a year and never let anyone else in on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Kerim and Geof, Mail Act-On is great for the occasional rule, but when you&#8217;re talking about filing mail into 100+ folders, it just isn&#8217;t the right tool; when I once tried it, I actually thought to myself, &#8220;I&#8217;m trying to use a screwdriver as a saw here!&#8221;  MsgFiler has now changed my life &#8212; I&#8217;m actually jealous that Alex has had access to this for over a year and never let anyone else in on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52869</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52869</guid>
		<description>Doug - MsgFiler currently works on Tiger only. If there&#039;s enough interest, I might look into supporting Panther.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug &#8211; MsgFiler currently works on Tiger only. If there&#8217;s enough interest, I might look into supporting Panther.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52866</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52866</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  Again, it goes back to mail filing policy: I have a very small number of collection points to file to [four], so this isn&#039;t going to work for me.  But it sounds like you segregate far more hardcore than that and also add collection points as necessary, so I can see why something that intuitively adds collectionability [yeah, it&#039;s early] is preferable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  Again, it goes back to mail filing policy: I have a very small number of collection points to file to [four], so this isn&#8217;t going to work for me.  But it sounds like you segregate far more hardcore than that and also add collection points as necessary, so I can see why something that intuitively adds collectionability [yeah, it's early] is preferable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug C.</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52865</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52865</guid>
		<description>I see that this is for 10.4.8. Can it work with earlier versions i.e. 10.3.x?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that this is for 10.4.8. Can it work with earlier versions i.e. 10.3.x?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52860</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52860</guid>
		<description>Anything that requires setting up rules/maintenence/etc. is losing or has lost a place in my toolbox. Tools like MsgFiler and LaunchBar (or QuickSilver) don&#039;t require me to set anything up to work well - I much prefer that. Especially since I use multiple machines.

I&#039;ve tried all the Mail.app add-ons, this and Mail Template are the only ones I&#039;ve found to be good enough to keep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that requires setting up rules/maintenence/etc. is losing or has lost a place in my toolbox. Tools like MsgFiler and LaunchBar (or QuickSilver) don&#8217;t require me to set anything up to work well &#8211; I much prefer that. Especially since I use multiple machines.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried all the Mail.app add-ons, this and Mail Template are the only ones I&#8217;ve found to be good enough to keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52859</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52859</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m right behind Kerim ... I use Mail Act-On for this functionality.  But I also don&#039;t nest folders, and nesting folders would keep MA-O from scaling well [since all the rules are, as best as I know, one-character-only, so ... you have limitations].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m right behind Kerim &#8230; I use Mail Act-On for this functionality.  But I also don&#8217;t nest folders, and nesting folders would keep MA-O from scaling well [since all the rules are, as best as I know, one-character-only, so ... you have limitations].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim Friedman</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52856</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerim Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2006/11/15/msgfiler#comment-52856</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Mail Act-On?

http://www.indev.ca/MailActOn.html

It is free. It requires a little setup, but it is very powerful and easy to use. You can do more than file, you can apply rules or applescripts, etc. I also like MailTags (be sure to try the beta) which works with IMAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Mail Act-On?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.indev.ca/MailActOn.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.indev.ca/MailActOn.html</a></p>
<p>It is free. It requires a little setup, but it is very powerful and easy to use. You can do more than file, you can apply rules or applescripts, etc. I also like MailTags (be sure to try the beta) which works with IMAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

