<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Apple&#8221; Branding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding</link>
	<description>Alex King, Denver Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: branding + design &#187; Apple: It&#8217;s All About the Brand</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-67121</link>
		<dc:creator>branding + design &#187; Apple: It&#8217;s All About the Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-67121</guid>
		<description>[...] Here a great article I found by WIRE magazine about the apple brand, and why it is so important. LINK  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here a great article I found by WIRE magazine about the apple brand, and why it is so important. LINK  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53956</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53956</guid>
		<description>eclipse: Sounds good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eclipse: Sounds good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eclipse</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53955</link>
		<dc:creator>eclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53955</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they plan to differentiate things by their user type. iPhone, iPod are individual use items. Apple TV would be a family/public use item. Mac/Power etc could be considered business use. 
Just a thought 

eclipse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they plan to differentiate things by their user type. iPhone, iPod are individual use items. Apple TV would be a family/public use item. Mac/Power etc could be considered business use.<br />
Just a thought </p>
<p>eclipse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53951</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53951</guid>
		<description>Apple would have probably used iTV as the brand... 

However over in the UK, ITV is a popular TV channel - so Apple would have to change it for the UK audience, so maybe to avoid any confusion from the offset they called it &quot;Apple TV&quot;?

Also, it would have some Google Keyword competition: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=iTV&quot;&gt;iTV&lt;/a&gt;&quot;; whereas &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=Apple+TV&quot;&gt;Apple TV&lt;/a&gt;&quot; is fine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple would have probably used iTV as the brand&#8230; </p>
<p>However over in the UK, ITV is a popular TV channel &#8211; so Apple would have to change it for the UK audience, so maybe to avoid any confusion from the offset they called it &#8220;Apple TV&#8221;?</p>
<p>Also, it would have some Google Keyword competition: &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=iTV">iTV</a>&#8220;; whereas &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Apple+TV">Apple TV</a>&#8221; is fine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53948</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53948</guid>
		<description>A theory: &quot;iPhone&quot; stealing from Cisco was intentional for the free press. Once this name fails to solidify, they simply fall back onto the Apple Phone, just as Apple TV is already... My wife said people at work talked about it for 2 days, and nobody is really techy or Mac-o-philes! 1 day for the announcement and the second with &quot;Did you hear they got sued?!&quot;. I just think it was Steve&#039;s plan all along... =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A theory: &#8220;iPhone&#8221; stealing from Cisco was intentional for the free press. Once this name fails to solidify, they simply fall back onto the Apple Phone, just as Apple TV is already&#8230; My wife said people at work talked about it for 2 days, and nobody is really techy or Mac-o-philes! 1 day for the announcement and the second with &#8220;Did you hear they got sued?!&#8221;. I just think it was Steve&#8217;s plan all along&#8230; =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53947</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/01/11/apple-branding#comment-53947</guid>
		<description>Wonderful observation. I was just thinking the same thing but I&#039;m still confused with the branding of Apple TV. Like you I&#039;m thinking they&#039;ll change the iMac to the Mac on the next radical release in order to make all computers be apart of the Mac brand. 

My best guess is that they&#039;ll make the &quot;i&quot; branding line software and make all gadgets and consumer electronics be part of the Apple Brand. However, they stuck with the iPhone.

The iPhone is a wrench in this whole scheme but here it goes:
Mac = Computers
Apple = Consumer Electronics
i = Software</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful observation. I was just thinking the same thing but I&#8217;m still confused with the branding of Apple TV. Like you I&#8217;m thinking they&#8217;ll change the iMac to the Mac on the next radical release in order to make all computers be apart of the Mac brand. </p>
<p>My best guess is that they&#8217;ll make the &#8220;i&#8221; branding line software and make all gadgets and consumer electronics be part of the Apple Brand. However, they stuck with the iPhone.</p>
<p>The iPhone is a wrench in this whole scheme but here it goes:<br />
Mac = Computers<br />
Apple = Consumer Electronics<br />
i = Software</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

