<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Inverse Comment Law&#8221; of Blogging</title>
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law</link>
	<description>Alex King's blog - software, photography, sports, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 in Review &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-60532</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 in Review &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-60532</guid>
		<description>[...] - I get to release a plugin to the public that was built for a client (yay!), share some thoughts on comments and blog posts, continue talking about the alexking.org redesign and start talking about browser tab usage. I also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - I get to release a plugin to the public that was built for a client (yay!), share some thoughts on comments and blog posts, continue talking about the alexking.org redesign and start talking about browser tab usage. I also [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La &#8220;Legge Inversa dei Commenti&#8221; at La Voce del Procione</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-56736</link>
		<dc:creator>La &#8220;Legge Inversa dei Commenti&#8221; at La Voce del Procione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-56736</guid>
		<description>[...] alexking)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] alexking)  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54890</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54890</guid>
		<description>mention science, ID, religion and the flying spaghetti monster in a fairly flippant post and you will be cr*pflooded with comments within hours.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mention science, ID, religion and the flying spaghetti monster in a fairly flippant post and you will be cr*pflooded with comments within hours.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54422</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54422</guid>
		<description>Ironically, you'll probably end up with a ton of comments on this post.

But I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one.  Happens to me all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, you&#8217;ll probably end up with a ton of comments on this post.</p>
<p>But I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one.  Happens to me all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54421</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54421</guid>
		<description>Heh. Alex and I have talked about this a half-dozen times.

My argument is that a well-crafted essay asks and answers all relevant questions, so unless someone is willing to take the time to pick everything apart, they're not going to comment [but will likely link it].  But something shorter, well, that's going to be incapable of answering every potential question and, therefore, draw comments.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Alex and I have talked about this a half-dozen times.</p>
<p>My argument is that a well-crafted essay asks and answers all relevant questions, so unless someone is willing to take the time to pick everything apart, they&#8217;re not going to comment [but will likely link it].  But something shorter, well, that&#8217;s going to be incapable of answering every potential question and, therefore, draw comments.  <img src='http://alexking.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baddie</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54419</link>
		<dc:creator>baddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54419</guid>
		<description>Agreed. The posts I just shove out of my system are usually the ones that receive a lot of comments. The posts I put a lot of thought on? One comment's a lot. Crazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. The posts I just shove out of my system are usually the ones that receive a lot of comments. The posts I put a lot of thought on? One comment&#8217;s a lot. Crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54411</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54411</guid>
		<description>And if you write anything about &lt;a href="http://nslog.com/2003/11/08/paris_hilton"&gt;Paris Hilton&lt;/a&gt;, 180+ people confuse you FOR Paris Hilton and comment as if they've found a way to communicate with the gal.

I've had some success with longer posts, but yeah: the posts on which I &lt;em&gt;expect&lt;/em&gt; to get comments are often the ones that don't get a single one. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you write anything about <a href="http://nslog.com/2003/11/08/paris_hilton">Paris Hilton</a>, 180+ people confuse you FOR Paris Hilton and comment as if they&#8217;ve found a way to communicate with the gal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had some success with longer posts, but yeah: the posts on which I <em>expect</em> to get comments are often the ones that don&#8217;t get a single one. <img src='http://alexking.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will langford</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54410</link>
		<dc:creator>will langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54410</guid>
		<description>Yea I don't think much time was spend on this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I don&#8217;t think much time was spend on this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54406</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54406</guid>
		<description>Just to be contrary, I'm not going to comment on this post. D'oh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be contrary, I&#8217;m not going to comment on this post. D&#8217;oh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fiala</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54405</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fiala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54405</guid>
		<description>You know, I'd have to agree with you to a point - I've done a lot of long posts in my own journal that got nothing at all, but a few sentances and a link to someone else will get a bunch of comments.

But if people are used to coming to your blog to read essays, then they get used to commenting on longer pieces... especially if they disagree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;d have to agree with you to a point - I&#8217;ve done a lot of long posts in my own journal that got nothing at all, but a few sentances and a link to someone else will get a bunch of comments.</p>
<p>But if people are used to coming to your blog to read essays, then they get used to commenting on longer pieces&#8230; especially if they disagree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard5</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54403</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54403</guid>
		<description>This is just comment bait and I'm falling for it... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just comment bait and I&#8217;m falling for it&#8230; <img src='http://alexking.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horne</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54402</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/02/09/inverse-comment-law#comment-54402</guid>
		<description>I feel compelled to comment just because I don't think you spent much time on this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel compelled to comment just because I don&#8217;t think you spent much time on this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
