<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior</link>
	<description>Alex King, Denver Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexkingorg</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167588</link>
		<dc:creator>alexkingorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167588</guid>
		<description>@sogrady The current version doesn&#039;t reach back in history, but perhaps we can create an add-on for the next-gen version to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sogrady The current version doesn&#8217;t reach back in history, but perhaps we can create an add-on for the next-gen version to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sogrady</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167587</link>
		<dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167587</guid>
		<description>@alexkingorg: totally forgot about that since the Twitter auth change broke my instance. need to re-enable it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alexkingorg: totally forgot about that since the Twitter auth change broke my instance. need to re-enable it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexkingorg</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167586</link>
		<dc:creator>alexkingorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-167586</guid>
		<description>@sogrady Tweet archiving was the original purpose of Twitter Tools. http://t.co/LmuMWJWD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sogrady Tweet archiving was the original purpose of Twitter Tools. <a href="http://t.co/LmuMWJWD" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/LmuMWJWD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin &#124; patio set</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-68980</link>
		<dc:creator>Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin &#124; patio set</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-68980</guid>
		<description>[...] Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin   Posted by root 14 minutes ago (http://alexking.org)        I don 39 t really want people to comment on my tweets that is why they are tweets in the first i 39 m thinking that storing them in a different table would be best proudly powered by wordpress and hosted by austin web development        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin   Posted by root 14 minutes ago (<a href="http://alexking.org" rel="nofollow">http://alexking.org</a>)        I don 39 t really want people to comment on my tweets that is why they are tweets in the first i 39 m thinking that storing them in a different table would be best proudly powered by wordpress and hosted by austin web development        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Proper Behavior for a Twitter Archiver WordPress Plugin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Henshall</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-66742</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Henshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-66742</guid>
		<description>Alex, 
You may like to take a look at this post. http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/02/04/twitter-and-my-blog/ This is how I use Delicious and Twitter

I use TwitterTools. I also use the Category Excluder to remove  the daily twitter posts from my home page RSS feed and archives. However, now all my Tweets are searchable from my blog! 

I&#039;ve also added to the side bar an RSS of search.twitter.com of all @stuarthenshall comments on twitter. They may not be in context of a post; they are part of my online public conversational life. 

There are some other changes I am writing up in a new blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,<br />
You may like to take a look at this post. <a href="http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/02/04/twitter-and-my-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.henshall.[...]and-my-blog/</a> This is how I use Delicious and Twitter</p>
<p>I use TwitterTools. I also use the Category Excluder to remove  the daily twitter posts from my home page RSS feed and archives. However, now all my Tweets are searchable from my blog! </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also added to the side bar an RSS of search.twitter.com of all @stuarthenshall comments on twitter. They may not be in context of a post; they are part of my online public conversational life. </p>
<p>There are some other changes I am writing up in a new blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Marinelli</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-61818</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Marinelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-61818</guid>
		<description>I love your plugin, and I&#039;m sorry if this isn&#039;t the right place to comment or inquire about features (I know it&#039;s an old post), but I&#039;m just dying to know if there might be a way to exclude, from the tweets that get posted as a digest, any and all posts that begin with &quot;@.&quot; 

When I first started using Twitter Tools, I really wasn&#039;t participating in the community of Twitter (that took awhile for me to grasp), and I liked having some coherent, reasonably interesting content automatically appearing on my blog even if I didn&#039;t have time to do a proper blog post. (Because some days that just can&#039;t be done.) 

But since I started using, with some frequency, the &quot;@&quot; function to participate in conversations on Twitter, I wince in horror at what gets posted to my blog, which isn&#039;t going to make a lick of sense to anyone who isn&#039;t already participating in Twitter. (In which case, they&#039;d probably prefer to follow those lines of conversation through the Twitter interface!) 

I would really, really LOVE having that as a feature.  (Alas, messing around with your code in order to try to customize it would be WAY over my head.) Just an option where you could check off, &quot;exclude @ replies.&quot; I think that would be genius.

Thanks for your great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your plugin, and I&#8217;m sorry if this isn&#8217;t the right place to comment or inquire about features (I know it&#8217;s an old post), but I&#8217;m just dying to know if there might be a way to exclude, from the tweets that get posted as a digest, any and all posts that begin with &#8220;@.&#8221; </p>
<p>When I first started using Twitter Tools, I really wasn&#8217;t participating in the community of Twitter (that took awhile for me to grasp), and I liked having some coherent, reasonably interesting content automatically appearing on my blog even if I didn&#8217;t have time to do a proper blog post. (Because some days that just can&#8217;t be done.) </p>
<p>But since I started using, with some frequency, the &#8220;@&#8221; function to participate in conversations on Twitter, I wince in horror at what gets posted to my blog, which isn&#8217;t going to make a lick of sense to anyone who isn&#8217;t already participating in Twitter. (In which case, they&#8217;d probably prefer to follow those lines of conversation through the Twitter interface!) </p>
<p>I would really, really LOVE having that as a feature.  (Alas, messing around with your code in order to try to customize it would be WAY over my head.) Just an option where you could check off, &#8220;exclude @ replies.&#8221; I think that would be genius.</p>
<p>Thanks for your great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54877</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54877</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, I think that I&#039;d want both, but for very different reasons.

If I want my &lt;i&gt;tweets&lt;/i&gt; to act like salt and pepper on my blog -- where I can sprinkle them wherever -- I think a separate table makes the most sense.

OTOH (and I really want this) if I&#039;d rather use WP more as a Tumblelog -- i.e. posts with no titles -- I&#039;d love to use Twitter as an input method that&#039;s equal to a native posting UI... using Twitter you get the benefit of using Jabber, SMS and the web UI, let alone the API. And, as a separate modification of a WP install, I could run it independent from my main blog, giving me the freedom to experiment while still having my regular blog that might show off a tweet here and there but wouldn&#039;t use that content as the *primary* content.

That&#039;s where I&#039;m at anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, I think that I&#8217;d want both, but for very different reasons.</p>
<p>If I want my <i>tweets</i> to act like salt and pepper on my blog &#8212; where I can sprinkle them wherever &#8212; I think a separate table makes the most sense.</p>
<p>OTOH (and I really want this) if I&#8217;d rather use WP more as a Tumblelog &#8212; i.e. posts with no titles &#8212; I&#8217;d love to use Twitter as an input method that&#8217;s equal to a native posting UI&#8230; using Twitter you get the benefit of using Jabber, SMS and the web UI, let alone the API. And, as a separate modification of a WP install, I could run it independent from my main blog, giving me the freedom to experiment while still having my regular blog that might show off a tweet here and there but wouldn&#8217;t use that content as the *primary* content.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where I&#8217;m at anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54860</guid>
		<description>Have a look at Jeremy Keith&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://adactio.com/extras/stream/&quot;&gt;lifestream&lt;/a&gt;.  It sounds vaguely similar....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at Jeremy Keith&#8217;s <a href="http://adactio.com/extras/stream/">lifestream</a>.  It sounds vaguely similar&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54844</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54844</guid>
		<description>I am torn, really. If the data was added to the Wordpress database then it could be easily intermixed with existing blog entries, and use the WP category hierarchy for archiving and searching for such entries.

However, if the data was added to a completely separate table, then it would be &quot;easier&quot; to play with on the side, without fear of tainting the WP tables. Additionally, by adding the data to a separate table, displaying the tweets is slightly more difficult for people that do not know much about SQL.

If I were to choose between the two, I would go for the latter. This way, the tweets could go in to a table that could be used to consolidate other similar data, which might be used to construct a more robust Lifestream-like page.

Just my $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am torn, really. If the data was added to the WordPress database then it could be easily intermixed with existing blog entries, and use the WP category hierarchy for archiving and searching for such entries.</p>
<p>However, if the data was added to a completely separate table, then it would be &#8220;easier&#8221; to play with on the side, without fear of tainting the WP tables. Additionally, by adding the data to a separate table, displaying the tweets is slightly more difficult for people that do not know much about SQL.</p>
<p>If I were to choose between the two, I would go for the latter. This way, the tweets could go in to a table that could be used to consolidate other similar data, which might be used to construct a more robust Lifestream-like page.</p>
<p>Just my $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54841</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54841</guid>
		<description>I personally would prefer storage in it&#039;s own table, that way I can pull it into my header the way I use the js that twitter provides now. Then instead of a link to twitter I can create a special page on my site that includes all of my twitts.
On the other hand, I could do the same thing with it being pulled in as posts and would give me more flexibility for the future. But the task would be rather complicated.
So, you&#039;re right I want both.
However, I think the majority of people that will want to use this plugin will need it to be simple. Modifying theme files to filter and sort isn&#039;t something the masses will like. I would presume that a sidebar widget would get huge acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally would prefer storage in it&#8217;s own table, that way I can pull it into my header the way I use the js that twitter provides now. Then instead of a link to twitter I can create a special page on my site that includes all of my twitts.<br />
On the other hand, I could do the same thing with it being pulled in as posts and would give me more flexibility for the future. But the task would be rather complicated.<br />
So, you&#8217;re right I want both.<br />
However, I think the majority of people that will want to use this plugin will need it to be simple. Modifying theme files to filter and sort isn&#8217;t something the masses will like. I would presume that a sidebar widget would get huge acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54840</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54840</guid>
		<description>I quite liked &lt;a href=&quot;http://adactio.com/journal/1202/&quot;&gt;Jermey Keith&#039;s Lifestream&lt;/a&gt; idea (as Mark mentions above). I know &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrisjdavis.org/lifestream-ala-wordpress&quot;&gt;Chris J Davis tried to do a WP implementation&lt;/a&gt; - but it never really worked for joe-public.

By giving each tweet it&#039;s own post (in WP), you&#039;d have more control how it is displayed/represented.
As long as the tweets are categorised/tagged properly, they can be filtered out accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite liked <a href="http://adactio.com/journal/1202/">Jermey Keith&#8217;s Lifestream</a> idea (as Mark mentions above). I know <a href="http://chrisjdavis.org/lifestream-ala-wordpress">Chris J Davis tried to do a WP implementation</a> &#8211; but it never really worked for joe-public.</p>
<p>By giving each tweet it&#8217;s own post (in WP), you&#8217;d have more control how it is displayed/represented.<br />
As long as the tweets are categorised/tagged properly, they can be filtered out accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Krynsky</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Krynsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54839</guid>
		<description>I lean towards Patrick&#039;s thoughts. I went along and joined the herd and created a Twitter account mainly to support my Lifestream. But I think this is functionality that makes much more sense to be incorporated as a plugin within my site. I like storing them in a seperate table from posts with their own feed. These aren&#039;t posts, but quick blurbs on what we are doing, quick streams of consciousness, or links with our own quick comment.

If there&#039;s the ability to post within the WP Admin page and store in a local table as well as Twitter&#039;s server via an API to take advantage of the social aspects of Twitter then I&#039;m all for it.

I&#039;ve seen another plugin called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fahlstad.se/wp-plugins/fquick/&quot;&gt;fquick&lt;/a&gt; which I was thinking of trying as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lean towards Patrick&#8217;s thoughts. I went along and joined the herd and created a Twitter account mainly to support my Lifestream. But I think this is functionality that makes much more sense to be incorporated as a plugin within my site. I like storing them in a seperate table from posts with their own feed. These aren&#8217;t posts, but quick blurbs on what we are doing, quick streams of consciousness, or links with our own quick comment.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s the ability to post within the WP Admin page and store in a local table as well as Twitter&#8217;s server via an API to take advantage of the social aspects of Twitter then I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen another plugin called <a href="http://www.fahlstad.se/wp-plugins/fquick/">fquick</a> which I was thinking of trying as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54838</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54838</guid>
		<description>When given a choice between two options, most people want &quot;both&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When given a choice between two options, most people want &#8220;both&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54837</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see them dropped in as posts, as long as we can specify the category -- that way they can be filtered and treated however we like...

It&#039;d be great to have the option of either generating individual posts, or a day&#039;s archive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see them dropped in as posts, as long as we can specify the category &#8212; that way they can be filtered and treated however we like&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be great to have the option of either generating individual posts, or a day&#8217;s archive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McNulty</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54836</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/06/twitter-archiver-behavior#comment-54836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking that storing them in a different table would be best.  That why people could, if they want to, have another process that creates digests and make that a post on their blog.

That might be too many steps though. :)  But the idea of having my tweets in a table I can do whatever I like with is compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking that storing them in a different table would be best.  That why people could, if they want to, have another process that creates digests and make that a post on their blog.</p>
<p>That might be too many steps though. <img src='http://alexking.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   But the idea of having my tweets in a table I can do whatever I like with is compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

