<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/25/around-the-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/25/around-the-web</link>
	<description>Alex King, Denver Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/25/around-the-web#comment-55191</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/03/25/around-the-web#comment-55191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The best use of Twitter IMO is as a microblog; supplementing your main blog. The question that remains is how best to integrate them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Essentially, anything I previously would have fired up WP to post that would be 200 characters or less is now Twitter&#039;d.  In terms of UI interaction, it&#039;s best described in the following analogy: Twittering:blogging::IM&#039;ing:emailing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The best use of Twitter IMO is as a microblog; supplementing your main blog. The question that remains is how best to integrate them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Essentially, anything I previously would have fired up WP to post that would be 200 characters or less is now Twitter&#8217;d.  In terms of UI interaction, it&#8217;s best described in the following analogy: Twittering:blogging::IM&#8217;ing:emailing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

