<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King Design is now Crowd Favorite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite</link>
	<description>Alex King, Denver Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Site Transition, Step 2 &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-60541</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Site Transition, Step 2 &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-60541</guid>
		<description>[...] King Design became Crowd Favorite last year, I employed a couple of techniques to try to make the web site transition as painless as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] King Design became Crowd Favorite last year, I employed a couple of techniques to try to make the web site transition as painless as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Williams&#8217; Blog - Freelance and Open Source Web Developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time for a name change - Help Wanted!</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56743</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Williams&#8217; Blog - Freelance and Open Source Web Developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time for a name change - Help Wanted!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56743</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed many people renaming their companies and I think my time has come.  There&#8217;s something that&#8217;s been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed many people renaming their companies and I think my time has come.  There&#8217;s something that&#8217;s been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From King Design to Crowd Favorite &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56657</link>
		<dc:creator>From King Design to Crowd Favorite &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56657</guid>
		<description>[...] of the challenges of renaming King Design to Crowd Favorite was how exactly to handle transitioning from kingdesign.net to the new crowdfavorite.net web site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the challenges of renaming King Design to Crowd Favorite was how exactly to handle transitioning from kingdesign.net to the new crowdfavorite.net web site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should You Get A .com Domain Name At All Costs? - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com - (formerly Healthy WebDesign)</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56618</link>
		<dc:creator>Should You Get A .com Domain Name At All Costs? - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com - (formerly Healthy WebDesign)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56618</guid>
		<description>[...] King has been facing this exactly question as he renames his business from King Design to Crowd Favorite. Of course, he couldn&#8217;t wrestle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] King has been facing this exactly question as he renames his business from King Design to Crowd Favorite. Of course, he couldn&#8217;t wrestle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision: crowdfavorite.net &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56606</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision: crowdfavorite.net &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56606</guid>
		<description>[...] a few people which they liked better and started getting interesting responses. That prompted me to take a poll, which led to even more interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few people which they liked better and started getting interesting responses. That prompted me to take a poll, which led to even more interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nas Raja</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56602</link>
		<dc:creator>Nas Raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56602</guid>
		<description>CrowdFave.com. Not just because .com is king (no pun intended) - but also because - if you go with CrowdFavorite.net - you have no guarantee that for instance, the current owner won&#039;t sell the domain to a porn blogger you would inevitably end up sending *your* visitors to every month - as people tend to type and link to .com versions of domain names rather frequently. In fact so much so that, if you were to go to with CrowdFavorite.net, given the popularity of your current site, the owner would start to get a nice stream of PPC income just by putting up an ad-filled parked page on CrowdFavorite.com.

There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/06/01/100050989/&quot;&gt;multi-million dollar business empires&lt;/a&gt; today that were made with domain squatting in the twilight years of the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CrowdFave.com. Not just because .com is king (no pun intended) &#8211; but also because &#8211; if you go with CrowdFavorite.net &#8211; you have no guarantee that for instance, the current owner won&#8217;t sell the domain to a porn blogger you would inevitably end up sending *your* visitors to every month &#8211; as people tend to type and link to .com versions of domain names rather frequently. In fact so much so that, if you were to go to with CrowdFavorite.net, given the popularity of your current site, the owner would start to get a nice stream of PPC income just by putting up an ad-filled parked page on CrowdFavorite.com.</p>
<p>There are <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/06/01/100050989/">multi-million dollar business empires</a> today that were made with domain squatting in the twilight years of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Arguments &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56562</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Arguments &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56562</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion around which domain name I should use for Crowd Favorite (both offline and online in the comments and on Twitter) has been very interesting to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion around which domain name I should use for Crowd Favorite (both offline and online in the comments and on Twitter) has been very interesting to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sanders</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56558</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56558</guid>
		<description>Stick with the .net domain, as the company name and domain should be the same, IMHO, unless you are willing to rename the company to Crowd Fave.

Someone would also like to point out that King Design was a perfectly acceptable name, as design is a very generic term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick with the .net domain, as the company name and domain should be the same, IMHO, unless you are willing to rename the company to Crowd Fave.</p>
<p>Someone would also like to point out that King Design was a perfectly acceptable name, as design is a very generic term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56557</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56557</guid>
		<description>I actually did consider using &#039;.it&#039; as crowdfavor.it.

But ditched it because it would be hard to say and have people remember what to type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually did consider using &#8216;.it&#8217; as crowdfavor.it.</p>
<p>But ditched it because it would be hard to say and have people remember what to type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56556</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56556</guid>
		<description>Ashame there&#039;s no .te TLD. 

cro.wd.fav.ori.te

Okay, okay, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashame there&#8217;s no .te TLD. </p>
<p>cro.wd.fav.ori.te</p>
<p>Okay, okay, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caro :)</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56555</link>
		<dc:creator>Caro :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56555</guid>
		<description>crowdfave.com seems like it&#039;d be quirkier / funner / catchier on a business card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crowdfave.com seems like it&#8217;d be quirkier / funner / catchier on a business card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56553</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56553</guid>
		<description>OK, registered thecrowdfavorite.com/net/org

I have a concern that folks will mistype thecrowdfavorite.com as just crowdfavorite.com since they are both .com. In this regard, crowdfave.com may be better.

However, crowdfave.com suffers from the &quot;how was that abbreviated again?&quot; problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, registered thecrowdfavorite.com/net/org</p>
<p>I have a concern that folks will mistype thecrowdfavorite.com as just crowdfavorite.com since they are both .com. In this regard, crowdfave.com may be better.</p>
<p>However, crowdfave.com suffers from the &#8220;how was that abbreviated again?&#8221; problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasar</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56552</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56552</guid>
		<description>Of the options available, voted for crowdfave.com but did not really like any of the options!!! 

Strongly suggest you DON&#039;T use crowdfavorite.net ... people will look for you at crowdfavorite.com.

How about:
- thecrowdfavorite.com
- crowdfavored.com

If you like one of these, be quick - all variations are available ....... and counting!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the options available, voted for crowdfave.com but did not really like any of the options!!! </p>
<p>Strongly suggest you DON&#8217;T use crowdfavorite.net &#8230; people will look for you at crowdfavorite.com.</p>
<p>How about:<br />
- thecrowdfavorite.com<br />
- crowdfavored.com</p>
<p>If you like one of these, be quick &#8211; all variations are available &#8230;&#8230;. and counting!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt W</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56549</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56549</guid>
		<description>I imagine you&#039;d take international work if it came to you, but my guess is that in general, your market is US based, so I think &#039;favourite&#039; would be a bad decision based on that.  I think some of the .com-need is starting to die down.  So many are bought up and the speculators are sitting on them hoping for too much money.  So for now at least, .net seems like a good option.  I agree with you Alex, for now, I think it would be a branding mistake actually to go with &#039;favourite&#039; given my assumption on your intended market.  I personally just dislike the european spellings of words like that anyhow, heh.

I voted for crowdfavorite.net.  If you absolutely felt you had to have a .com, then I would go for crowdfave.com.  I just don&#039;t like the ltd.  It&#039;s kind of like ... I, in general, don&#039;t care of you&#039;re a C Corp, a LLC, or any of that other stuff.  The ltd thing is going to drop off in my mind.  crowdfave.com, I could probably remember.

I still think crowdfavorite.net is the best choice for what you&#039;ve supplied to choose from (and no, that is not meant to imply I have some other idea that would be better)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine you&#8217;d take international work if it came to you, but my guess is that in general, your market is US based, so I think &#8216;favourite&#8217; would be a bad decision based on that.  I think some of the .com-need is starting to die down.  So many are bought up and the speculators are sitting on them hoping for too much money.  So for now at least, .net seems like a good option.  I agree with you Alex, for now, I think it would be a branding mistake actually to go with &#8216;favourite&#8217; given my assumption on your intended market.  I personally just dislike the european spellings of words like that anyhow, heh.</p>
<p>I voted for crowdfavorite.net.  If you absolutely felt you had to have a .com, then I would go for crowdfave.com.  I just don&#8217;t like the ltd.  It&#8217;s kind of like &#8230; I, in general, don&#8217;t care of you&#8217;re a C Corp, a LLC, or any of that other stuff.  The ltd thing is going to drop off in my mind.  crowdfave.com, I could probably remember.</p>
<p>I still think crowdfavorite.net is the best choice for what you&#8217;ve supplied to choose from (and no, that is not meant to imply I have some other idea that would be better)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hubbs</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56548</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexking.org/blog/2007/06/04/king-design-is-now-crowd-favorite#comment-56548</guid>
		<description>I voted for the .net as well.  Yeah, Geof, we do a have a thing for .nets.  :-)  But it keeps the names synced up, and eventually the .com name will come available, and you can then rather seamlessly transition to it if you so desire.  

To my mind, it&#039;s much easier remembering the &quot;.net&quot; part than to remember to add &quot;ltd&quot; or to remember just how the name is shortened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for the .net as well.  Yeah, Geof, we do a have a thing for .nets.  <img src='http://alexking.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   But it keeps the names synced up, and eventually the .com name will come available, and you can then rather seamlessly transition to it if you so desire.  </p>
<p>To my mind, it&#8217;s much easier remembering the &#8220;.net&#8221; part than to remember to add &#8220;ltd&#8221; or to remember just how the name is shortened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

