<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery vs. Other Libraries</title>
	<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries</link>
	<description>Alex King's blog - software, photography, sports, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-63619</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-63619</guid>
		<description>Being a non developer, I love JQuery.  I started to use it with Ext JS and found the two a great combination.  Hats off to both teams for their great contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a non developer, I love JQuery.  I started to use it with Ext JS and found the two a great combination.  Hats off to both teams for their great contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J P</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-63607</link>
		<dc:creator>J P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-63607</guid>
		<description>jQuery made me a believer in javascript again! Actually, it's the fact that I no longer have to code for NN4 and IE5 on Mac that brought me back. For a few years I was happy to "javascript is evil" and end any discussion at that.

And I do agree that it currently doesn't have "perfect form", which is another reason to love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery made me a believer in javascript again! Actually, it&#8217;s the fact that I no longer have to code for NN4 and IE5 on Mac that brought me back. For a few years I was happy to &#8220;javascript is evil&#8221; and end any discussion at that.</p>
<p>And I do agree that it currently doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;perfect form&#8221;, which is another reason to love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asbjørn Ulsberg</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62468</link>
		<dc:creator>Asbjørn Ulsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62468</guid>
		<description>I've made the switch to jQuery too and although I think the documentation could be better and more extensive, Firebug makes everything related to JS development so easy that I manage well without it.

Apropos WordPress, am I the only one who finds its plugin "framework" (or lack thereof) a bit disappointing? There isn't a good way to ensure only one jQuery file is included, etc. Having a lot of different plugins from a lot of different authors enabled often makes the resulting HTML extremely bloated and incompabilities between plugins are very hard to discover and solve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made the switch to jQuery too and although I think the documentation could be better and more extensive, Firebug makes everything related to JS development so easy that I manage well without it.</p>
<p>Apropos WordPress, am I the only one who finds its plugin &#8220;framework&#8221; (or lack thereof) a bit disappointing? There isn&#8217;t a good way to ensure only one jQuery file is included, etc. Having a lot of different plugins from a lot of different authors enabled often makes the resulting HTML extremely bloated and incompabilities between plugins are very hard to discover and solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someguy</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62420</link>
		<dc:creator>someguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62420</guid>
		<description>Especially since Prototype/Scriptaculous are so friggin heavy (200K+), the minimal size of jQuery (minified + gzipped ~ 13k) makes a significant difference on heavy-traffic sites (our site gets about 1 mm hits per day).

Needless to say, P+S are out, jQ is in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially since Prototype/Scriptaculous are so friggin heavy (200K+), the minimal size of jQuery (minified + gzipped ~ 13k) makes a significant difference on heavy-traffic sites (our site gets about 1 mm hits per day).</p>
<p>Needless to say, P+S are out, jQ is in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62286</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/03/24/jquery-vs-other-libraries#comment-62286</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I recently made the switch, and now I can't get enough of jQuery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I recently made the switch, and now I can&#8217;t get enough of jQuery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
